Course ID: | HPAM 7550. 3 hours. |
Course Title: | Quality Improvement in Health I |
Course Description: | Introduction to quality improvement in public health and healthcare delivery from a multi-stakeholder perspective. Students will use proven quality improvement models to evaluate and improve current systems, structures, and processes. Using practical skills acquired through case analysis, students will evaluate performance improvement initiatives at the system, organization, and individual provider/patient levels. Students will assess risks associated with patient safety and evaluate opportunities for improving the patient experience. |
Oasis Title: | Quality Improvement Health I |
Duplicate Credit: | Not open to students with credit in HPAM 7550E |
Semester Course Offered: | Offered every year. |
Grading System: | A-F (Traditional) |
|
Course Objectives: | Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:
1. Describe quality and improvement within public health and
healthcare delivery from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives.
2. Identify the key factors that support/hinder continuous
learning in public health and healthcare delivery.
3. Appraise current systems, structures, and processes to assess
risks and identify opportunities for improvement.
4. Analyze and evaluate quality and performance improvement
initiatives at the system, organization, and individual
(provider/patient) levels.
5. Design and propose implementation strategies for quality and
performance improvement programs that employ “systems thinking.” |
Topical Outline: | 1. The goals of public health and healthcare delivery systems
and the concepts of quality, safety, risk management,
improvement, and continuous learning
2. Crossing the Quality Chasm (Institute of Medicine, 2001) and
other opportunities and challenges
3. The Donabedian model and control of processes versus control
of outcomes
4. Attribution and causality
5. Approaches to support continuous learning for
individuals/patients
a. Influence of context, values, perceptions, and prior
experience
b. Introduction to N=1 trials, statistical process control
c. Issues associated with adoption and adherence
6. Approaches to support continuous learning for public
health/healthcare providers
a. Influence of context, values, perceptions, and prior
experience
b. Introduction to professional exams and licensing,
continuing education programs, and incentive systems
c. Issues associated with locus of control
7. Approaches to support continuous learning for public
health/healthcare organizations
a. Influence of context, balancing performance goals, risk
management, and quality improvement
b. Introduction to learning organizations and capacity for
change models
c. Introduction to Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycles, quality
circles, process mapping and redesign (clinical pathways, lean
enterprise), and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
8. Approaches to support continuous learning for public
health/healthcare systems
a. Issues in system assessment, measurement requirements, and
risk adjustment
b. Introduction to accreditation/certification models (e.g.,
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
(JCAHO), International Organization for Standardization (ISO))
c. Introduction to quality award models (e.g., Malcolm
Baldridge National Quality Award, European Foundation for
Quality Management (EFQM))
d. Introduction to professional supervision models (e.g.,
“visitation” in The Netherlands)
e. Introduction to provider incentive models (e.g., Pay-for-
Performance)
9. Improving the evidence base in quality improvement in
public health and healthcare delivery
10. Quality and safety as goals in health policy and health
system reform |
Honor Code Reference: | All students are responsible for maintaining the highest standards
of honesty and integrity in every phase of their academic
careers. The penalties for academic dishonesty are severe, and
ignorance is not an acceptable defense. Academic honesty means
performing all academic work without plagiarizing, cheating,
lying, tampering, stealing, receiving assistance from any other
person, or using any source of information that is not common
knowledge. |